What is EBITDA

EBITDA, or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, is a financial measure of the operational performance of a company. It is used to gauge a company’s cash-generate abilities based on factors that management can influence. Since the company’s debt structure, methods of depreciation, and taxes are things that management has limited discretion over, they are added back to Net Income to evaluate the profitability of the business.

While EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure, its popularity has led most companies to report it on their financial statements. However, it is recommended that other metrics, such as earnings per share (EPS) and free cash flow, be used in conjunction when analyzing the profitability and performance of companies.

A brief history

EBITDA was originally coined by American media billionaire, John Malone, during the ’70s as a way of analyzing the cash-generating capabilities of telecom companies. Malone argued that EBITDA was a better way of looking at high-growth capital intensive companies in place of the then-popular EPS. Cable television companies’ primary source of growth was through acquiring systems and investing in expanding infrastructure; EPS did not reflect this growth.

In the ’80s, the metric was popularized by leveraged buyouts that targeted distressed firms. Firms used EBITDA to evaluate whether the target company could service the debt used to finance the deals.

Despite this, it has yet to be formally recognized as a Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) or by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) as a metric.

How to calculate EBITDA

EBITDA = Net Income + Interest + Taxes + Depreciation + Amortization

EBITDA = Operating Profit + Depreciation + Amortization

Interest – different companies will have different capital structures, resulting in varying interest expenses. Adding interest back allows for comparison between similar companies and ignoring the impact of the capital structure.

Taxes – similar to interest, companies operate in different locations with different tax rules. Thus, adding taxes back allows for analysis of management’s performance.

Depreciation – depreciation methods are set by accounting standards and decided by management in past periods. As a result, depreciation does not reflect the operating performance of the company for the reporting period. Furthermore, depreciation is only the recognition of an asset being devalued but not actual cash is paid.

Amortization – similar to depreciation, adding amortization back to Net Income makes sense as it is not actual cash paid. Instead, amortization is the recognition of the depleting value of an intangible asset, which has already been paid for.

Income Statement

When and why is EBITDA used?

EBITDA is primarily used for evaluating the operational performance and valuation of a company. Analysts and investors use this metric with other metrics in order to compare between similar companies. For example, Debt/EBITDA is used to understand how leveraged a company is, while Enterprise Value (EV)/EBITDA is used to understand how a company’s valuation compares to similar businesses.

EBITDA is also used by companies that are in the high-growth stage and or require high capital investment in order for growth. Examples of these companies include telecommunication companies that need to invest in infrastructure to grow their services and subscriber base and technology companies that amortize the large initial cost of software development over time. In both examples, the companies’ growth is dependent on large expenditures; looking at Net Income alone would lead most investors to believe these companies are distressed, when in fact they are growing.

It should be said that EBITDA is not a measure of free cash flow. Taxes and interest expenses are financial obligations that companies must pay with cash. At best, EBITDA demonstrates how much cash the company’s business model can generate before accounting for the capital structure.

Benefits and drawbacks of using EBITDA


Validation of the business model – EBITDA focuses primarily on the profits of the company, allowing for the assessment of the viability of the business model. The factors that are added back are not a by-product of the company’s operations.

The gauge of management’s performance – similar to the above, EBITDA assesses performance based on factors that management can influence. Taxes and interest rates can rarely be influenced by management. Furthermore, decisions around depreciation and amortization are made in the past and are not reflective of management’s decisions in the current period.

Allows for comparison of similar firms – taxes and interest rates will differ between companies. Adding back these factors allows for an appropriate comparison between similar firms.

Appropriate financial view for capital intensive firms – companies that have a large base of assets and or have to spend a high amount on intangibles, such as software development, will have high depreciation and amortization. This makes companies look less profitable despite high growth.


Not accepted under GAAP (or SEC and IFSB) – despite its popular use, EBITDA is a non-GAAP measure. As a result, there is no governing body that oversees how EBITDA is calculated. This leaves organizations open to determine if and how they want to report EBITDA.

Masks financial burdens of debts – by adding back interest expense, EBITDA effectively ignores the cost of debt. Companies that carry large debts with high-interest rates are may look unrealistically profitable under EBITDA as interest expenses are still financial obligations of the company.

Ignores costs of assets – by adding back interest expenses and depreciation, EBITDA treats assets as if they are free. The assets held by a company do come at a cost, which is reflected by economic factors that impact the salvage value.

Ignores working capital – EBITDA does not take into consideration the cash required to actually keep the business model running. While it focuses on profitability it ignores the cash that is required to fund the inventory.

Key takeaways

  • EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) is a financial metric of an organization’s performance and cash-generating capabilities
  • As a non-GAAP measure, companies can decide how they want to report EBITDA
  • EBITDA can be misleading as it adds back financial obligations that the company must pay in cash, such as taxes and interest expense
  • Other metrics, such as EPS and Net Income, should also be used when evaluating a company’s performance
Recommended Resources:

Uncover your strengths and weaknesses with our complimentary assessment. Boost your effectiveness at work and with your team.

Free Resource Library: Access our extensive collection of valuable resources for instant support in your personal and professional growth.

Explore Our Course Library:

Enhance your leadership skills with our diverse selection of courses. Take your abilities to the next level and become a more effective leader and team player.


Our Clients Love the Professional Leadership Institute

Your team will, too! Check out some reviews from our students.
The PLI program was invaluable to our network.
The range of topics delivered, the open dialogue, experience, and examples that PLI brought to each session were outstanding and provided a path for our Franchisees and Managers to look at leadership, coaching, and connecting with their teams in a new light. Many have implemented these strategies in their bakeries and have seen immediate results.
Michelle C.
COBS Bread
Highly recommend to help your team move forward
We have locations around BC and Alberta, so getting people on the same page can be very difficult... Until now. Our entire management team and location managers take the same great courses and then meet monthly online with our coach to apply it to our situation. People are engaged, the courses are excellent, we love our coach, and we are all learning together!
Jason Fawcett
President, Kelson Group
The result has been a transformation of our culture. 
We decided to implement PLI's strategies across the country in over 150 locations and over 3500 employees.  The result has been a transformation of our culture.  People's lives have been positively impacted - professionally and personally.  Morale is high and sales and profits are up as a result.
Daryl Verbeek
Daryl Verbeek
We’ve learned how to fix ongoing personnel issues once and for all
The roadmap laid out set our business up to quintuple in sales.  We've learned how to fix ongoing personnel issues once and for all, attract top talent, and spend our time focused on results, not internal staffing problems.  I highly recommend PLI to you - it's worked for us!
John DeJong
Satisfied Client
I had no idea that running a business could be this fun!
In less than 18 months of working with Trevor, he has transformed my business from being average to exceptional, where mediocrity is not acceptable, where being great is standard.  Working with PLI has allowed me to realize my dream of not simply owning a job, but owning a business.
Justin Bontkes
Principal, Caliber Projects
Our culture has taken major steps forward this year
Our culture has taken major steps forward this year with Trevor’s help.  He is funny, relatable, and his tools are very very practical and have helped us focus and upgrade our teams throughout our retail network. Trevor recently spoke to an employee group, and one person remarked, “I could listen to Trevor all day.”   We would highly recommend Trevor.
Stan Pridham
Founder, KMS Tools
The results have been remarkable
At first, we resisted, “This just won’t work with a law firm.” But we persisted and the results have been remarkable: our client base and profits have steadily improved, and staff engagement and morale is the healthiest its ever been.
Doug Lester
Partner, RDM Lawyers
Helped our fast-growing business become what it is today
I've experienced PLI's approach first hand and it's been crucial to sustaining our growth.  I can't imagine a business that wouldn't benefit greatly from his help.
Brian Antenbring
Founder, TEEMA
Provided practical ways to make positive changes
Trevor was incredibly well-received by the entire organization. He was able to articulate people issues that many of our franchisees were experiencing and provided them with practical ways to make positive changes. We have implemented the Star Chart tool across the organization and see it as vital to building happy, effective teams.
Aaron Gillespie
President, COBS Bread
Scroll to Top

Start Learning Today

For Individuals

Unlock your potential and accelerate your career with sought-after management and leadership skills.


Transform Your Organization

For Teams

Book a consultation to discuss your challenges and discover how we can help you build a winning team.


Sign Up For Weekly Tips!

Get Weekly Coaching Tips Straight To Your Inbox Every Monday.